Radiometric dating is not accurate birth order affects dating

15 Feb

So, we have a “clock” which starts ticking the moment something dies.Obviously, this works only for things which were once living.It is certainly incorrect, and it is certainly based on wrong assumptions, but it is not inaccurate. One thing that is not being directly measured is the actual age of the sample.There is no “age-meter” that you can plug into a rock, giving an immediate read-out of the rock’s age.While there is no proof that the rates were different in the past than they are today, there is also no proof that they were the same.Thus radioactive dating relies purely on assumptions.This assumption is backed by numerous scientific studies and is relatively sound.

Historical science is not capable of repetition, checking or peer‑review.

C) dating usually want to know about the radiometric[1] dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years.

People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history. Christians, by definition, take the statements of Jesus Christ seriously.

You can help Amazing Discoveries reduce costs by upgrading or replacing your internet browser with one of the options below.

We thank you in advance for partnering with us in this small but significant way. All methods of radioactive dating rely on three assumptions that may not necessarily be true: It is assumed that the rate of decay has remained constant over time.